Our Intellectual Property team has extensive experience in Intellectual property matters, combined with in-depth knowledge in corporate law, tax and dispute resolution issues. When the projects require, we involve counsel patent attorneys and external experts. That allows us to provide accurate, practical and cost-effective advice. ALRUD Intellectual Property team consists of Associates, Patent Attorneys and Attorneys-at-law which allow us to represent the clients before the State Authorities (Patent Office, Customs, Federal Anti-Monopoly Bodies and Courts).
(partly state owned) on establishment of joint venture in the field of power engineering with a foreign partner. Managed development of international IP concept of the transaction, IP assets due diligence, structuring and transfer within the group of companies.
in litigations with the cybersquatter on unlawful web-site containing client’s name.
in the trademark and domain dispute with the competitor, who alleged that it is an official distributor of the client and sells counterfeit goods.
on patent protection against unauthorized usage by third parties.
on the conclusion, modification of licensing agreements for the provision of access to analytical databases owned by the client.
in anti-counterfeit matters involving counterfeit online sales in the internet, online aggregators and in social media.
in obtaining exclusive rights to the company’s main brand for babies’ skin care cosmetics within the territory of Russia.
in running provocative advertising campaign with regard to its compliance to the Russian advertising law.
with complex advice on entering into the franchise arrangements, including structuring the transaction, negotiating terms with the Russian partner.
with regard to release of the client’s Russian web site from blacklist of Roscomnadzor.
in protection of the trade name and trademark from the unlawful use by the third party; assisted in contrariety to the unfair competition of the third parties.
on the legal remedies available as well as the risks due to existence of non-used trademark owned by the competitor, including chances and risks relating to initiating non-use cancellation actions by the client.